📊 Field Report Assessment Rubric

Ngā Paerewa Aromatawai — Assessment Criteria for Ecosystem Investigation

Year 9 Science: Aotearoa's Living Landscapes

Assessment: Field Report — Comparing Two Microhabitats

NZC Level: 5 (Science: Nature of Science & Living World)

Total: 32 marks

Achievement Levels

Not Achieved (N): 0-12 marks — Does not meet the standard
Achieved (A): 13-19 marks — Meets the standard
Merit (M): 20-26 marks — Meets the standard with merit
Excellence (E): 27-32 marks — Meets the standard with excellence

Criteria	Not Achieved (1)	Achieved (2)	Merit (3)	Excellence (4)
Research Question & Hypothesis (4 marks)	Research question unclear or missing. No hypothesis or prediction given.	Research question is stated. Hypothesis is given but may lack clear reasoning.	Clear, focused research question. Hypothesis includes prediction AND reasoning based on prior knowledge.	Excellent research question that is specific and testable. Hypothesis is scientifically reasoned with reference to ecological concepts.
Method (4 marks)	Method is missing or incomplete. Steps are unclear or out of order.	Method is present with basic steps. Some detail missing but replicable.	Clear, step-by-step method that could be replicated. Equipment listed. Variables considered.	Detailed, logical method with excellent scientific practice. Clear identification of variables. Acknowledges cultural protocols (tikanga).
Data Collection & Recording (4 marks)	Little or no data collected. Tables incomplete or poorly organized.	Data collected for both sites. Tables completed but may have gaps or errors.	Accurate data for both sites. Tables are well-organized with units. Both abiotic and biotic data included.	Comprehensive, precise data collection. Tables are thorough with all measurements. Native/introduced species correctly identified.
Data Presentation (4 marks)	No graph or chart, or graph is incorrect/illegible.	Graph or chart is present and shows data. May have minor errors in labeling or scale.	Graph is well-constructed with title, labels, units, and appropriate scale. Data is accurately represented.	Excellent graph with all components. Graph type is optimal for data. Professional presentation with clear visual comparison.
Discussion & Analysis (4 marks)	Little or no analysis. Results not explained.	Basic description of results. Some attempt to explain patterns using scientific ideas.	Clear analysis of patterns. Results explained using ecological concepts (e.g., habitat, adaptation, competition). Links abiotic factors to species distribution.	Insightful analysis with sophisticated understanding. Excellent use of scientific vocabulary. Makes connections between multiple factors and ecological principles.
Hypothesis Evaluation (4 marks)	Does not address whether hypothesis was supported.	States whether hypothesis was supported but with limited comparison to data.	Clearly states whether hypothesis was supported with specific reference to data as evidence.	Thorough evaluation of hypothesis with detailed comparison to results. Discusses what this means for understanding the ecosystem.
Limitations & Improvements (4 marks)	No limitations identified or unrealistic improvements.	One or two limitations identified. Basic suggestions for improvement.	Multiple valid limitations identified. Practical improvements suggested that would increase reliability or accuracy.	Comprehensive identification of limitations with sophisticated understanding of scientific method. Improvements are well-reasoned and demonstrate critical thinking.
Kaitiakitanga & Conclusion (4 marks)	No conclusion or kaitiakitanga connection. Recommendations missing.	Basic conclusion summarizing findings. Some attempt at conservation recommendations.	Clear conclusion with ecosystem health assessment. Thoughtful kaitiakitanga recommendations based on findings.	Excellent conclusion integrating scientific findings with authentic kaitiakitanga perspective. Recommendations are specific, practical, and demonstrate environmental responsibility.

Marking Sheet

Student Name: ________________________________

Research Question & Hypothesis _____ / 4

Method _____ / 4

Data Collection & Recording _____ / 4

Data Presentation (Graph) _____ / 4

Discussion & Analysis _____ / 4

Hypothesis Evaluation _____ / 4

Limitations & Improvements _____ / 4

Kaitiakitanga & Conclusion _____ / 4

TOTAL _____ / 32

GRADE ☐ N ☐ A ☐ M ☐ E

Teacher Feedback | Urupare Kaiako

Strengths / Ngā Kaha:

Areas for Development / Ngā Wāhi Whakawhanake:

Next Steps / Ngā Mahi Whai Ake: