Whakataukī | Proverb
"MÄ te rongo, ka mÅhio; mÄ te mÅhio, ka mÄrama; mÄ te mÄrama, ka mÄtau; mÄ te mÄtau, ka ora"
Through listening comes knowledge; through knowledge comes understanding; through understanding comes wisdom; through wisdom comes life.
Both Western science and mÄtauranga MÄori are valid knowledge systems for understanding our world. They ask different questions, use different methods, and value different outcomes - but when integrated thoughtfully, they create powerful solutions. This isn't about choosing one over the other - it's about honoring both!
š¬ Science & MÄtauranga MÄori
Unit 3: Dual Knowledge Systems
š Learning Objectives:
- Compare Western science and mÄtauranga MÄori approaches
- Recognize both as valid knowledge systems
- Identify opportunities for integration
- Appreciate complementary strengths
To understand natural phenomena through systematic observation, experimentation, and evidence-based reasoning.
Scientific method: hypothesis ā experiment ā data collection ā analysis ā conclusion. Repeatable, measurable, peer-reviewed.
Objectivity, precision, reproducibility, universal laws, quantifiable results.
Precise measurements, controlled experiments, technological innovation, global communication of findings.
Testing water quality using pH meters, chemical analysis, and statistical data to determine pollution levels.
To understand the world through relationships, interconnections, and knowledge passed through generations.
Observation over generations, oral tradition, practical application, spiritual understanding, connection to whenua (land).
Kaitiakitanga (guardianship), whanaungatanga (relationships), balance, sustainability, spiritual connection.
Long-term observation, holistic understanding, cultural context, sustainable practices, relationship with environment.
Reading water health through presence of native species, plant indicators, and traditional knowledge of seasonal patterns.
⨠Integration in Action
š Water Quality Monitoring
Science approach: Chemical testing, pH meters, bacterial counts, data logging.
MÄtauranga approach: Observing native fish species, plant health, seasonal patterns, traditional indicators.
Integration: Use scientific instruments to measure precise data, while also training community members to recognize traditional indicators. Both methods validate each other!
š± Forest Restoration
Science approach: Soil analysis, biodiversity surveys, growth rate measurements, carbon sequestration data.
MÄtauranga approach: Understanding which plants grow together naturally, traditional planting times, spiritual significance of species, long-term sustainability.
Integration: Use scientific data to track progress, while following traditional knowledge about companion planting and seasonal timing. Honor both approaches!
š Marine Conservation
Science approach: Population counts, tagging studies, genetic analysis, ecosystem modeling.
MÄtauranga approach: RÄhui (temporary bans), traditional fishing methods, knowledge of breeding seasons, respect for tapu areas.
Integration: Scientific data confirms when rÄhui is needed, while traditional practices ensure sustainable harvest. Both protect the resource!
š Critical Thinking Questions
1. Why is it important to recognize BOTH knowledge systems as valid?
2. Think of a local environmental issue. How could science AND mÄtauranga work together to solve it?
3. What are the risks of ONLY using one knowledge system? What might we miss?
š Extension Challenge
Design an Integrated Research Project: Choose an environmental issue in your community. Design a research plan that uses BOTH scientific methods AND mÄtauranga approaches!
Environmental issue:
Scientific methods I would use:
MÄtauranga approaches I would use:
How they would work together: